Shamelessness is shameless. Why is a shameless person smarter ...

23.09.2019

In everyday life, we often say phrases: "A man without conscience", "shameless", "no shame, no conscience", "completely lost conscience", "live according to conscience." What is conscience? Conscience is the noble element of the soul.

However, not every person has a conscience. Some have it, others - it is dormant, for the time being, and still others - it is absent altogether or is lost due to the zombie or degradation of the soul. Those people who have a conscience, and act according to conscience, according to the principle: "Do with others as you would like to be treated with you."

A conscientious person weighs his actions, corrects mistakes, restrains irritation and negative emotions. Even when you really want to answer the offender with rudeness to rudeness, he finds words and expressions to stop an unpleasant conversation, a scene. Such a person can lose loved ones, friends, but he will never lose himself, because he has a conscience - a good advisor in life. A sense of conscience in an extraordinary way protects its owner from the loss of the most important thing - honesty and decency. Those who have their conscience dormant for the time being, one day realize that they have lived their lives wrong, violating natural laws.

The conscience of such people wakes up, and with it comes problems associated with working off everything that has been done in life not according to conscience, but in the way you want. Repentance comes: "Why did I do this then?" Sometimes this "why" hangs in the air, because it is impossible to correct the situation, the problem - it just took time, and with it the people who participated in this situation.

Let's talk about the third - who have no conscience at all. I think that they are the most unlucky in life. A person without conscience is an aggressor, a ruthless person. It seems to him that he is strong, cunning, dexterous. He is lucky, and everything works out for the time being, for his soul is slowly smoldering. Today he deceived, tomorrow he stepped over love, friendship, family relations, betrayed someone or sold for money. Sooner or later, such a person becomes lonely, unnecessary to anyone. And even those for whom he worked especially hard leave him. There is nothing worse than oblivion and loneliness. There comes a time when a person meets his conscience. It gives rise to a feeling of shame in the soul, for all those actions that have already been committed and remained in the past.

The past cannot be returned, not corrected, and already there, in all conscience, not to enter. In the present, because of this, chaos and imbalance occur, we are losing the most precious thing we have. Conscience clearly regulates all values from spiritual to material. Therefore, a person without conscience clings to material values, losing the most important - spiritual. And then they say about him: "He has no shame, no conscience."

Those who have a conscience cannot understand those who have no conscience at all. Do not try to explain to a shameless person that he is doing wrong, unworthy - he will never understand you, because he has no conscience, which means his views on life and values. It should be noted that a person who has no conscience is energetically infectious to others, he, like a parasite, wants more and more, but, as a rule, at someone else's expense. And since he has no conscience, he is not able to love, regret, be merciful. Do not knock on closed souls, just give all the problems associated with this person to the will of the Higher Forces and time - this way you will save your bright soul from destruction.

Question 1. How is the sense of duty manifested? Does everyone have a conscience?

Duty, a sense of duty - who does what he can, does what he must. Madeleine de Scudery - Debt is something that no one else will do at this moment but you. Penelope Fitzgerald - Debt is something that you think about with disgust, do it with reluctance and then boast for a long time.

Conscience - the ability of a person to independently formulate moral obligations and implement moral self-control, demand from himself their fulfillment and evaluate the actions he performs; one of the expressions of the moral self-awareness of the individual. It manifests itself both in the form of rational awareness of the moral significance of the actions performed, and in the form of emotional experiences - feelings of guilt or "remorse", that is, it links mind and emotions together.

A sense of duty in our society is respected, praised and cultivated, because it obliges us and others to do great things.

Question 2. What is debt?

Debt is an internally accepted (voluntary) commitment.

A debt can be defined as the obligation of a subject or group of subjects to another subject or subjects (for example, people or God). Most often, a moral obligation (moral duty, moral duty) is considered as a duty - a voluntary moral obligation of an individual to other people.

Question 3. What are objective responsibilities?

Objective duties are those duties that a person can fulfill, that is, they are real, earthly and within his power.

Our whole life is filled with relationships with other people, with society: we have parents, family, friends, classmates, colleagues, there are just people around us, there is our home, city, homeland. Debt binds us to them. This means that we have certain objective duties and responsibilities to each of those around us, to the entire society. The word "objective" means independent of our personal desires (that is, whether we like it or not, we must certainly fulfill them). Otherwise, we will not be able to live in society, we will become a source of constant troubles (or even troubles) for those around us, and for ourselves. Deceived, let down a comrade - you can be left without friends at all; hack work will eventually hit the hack himself, etc.

Question 4. What aspects does science offer to distinguish in debt?

Science proposes to distinguish two sides in debt: public duty and moral duty. Public duty is all the objective responsibilities that a person needs to fulfill in life. Responsibilities exist wherever a person acts: at work, on vacation, in school, in social activities, at home, in the family, in public places, in relation to friends, people around him, nature, as well as to oneself. In order for society to live and develop, everyone must fulfill their responsibilities regardless of personal desires and inclinations. By the way, many public duties are regulated by law, laws of a coercive nature. Honest performance of duty benefits everyone - both society as a whole and an individual, and dishonest can lead to the most sad consequences.

Question 5. What is moral duty?

Moral duty is the transformation of external cultural norms into the personal task of each person.

This means that a person is not only aware of moral requirements. He makes these requirements to himself and follows them in life. Note: to himself, without any extraneous prompts (bosses, others), by inner motivation - voluntarily, disinterestedly, courageously. Therefore, there is nothing stronger than moral duty.

Just do not oversimplify, imagine that when fulfilling a moral duty, everything goes easily and fun, like clockwork. No, very often a person experiences deep internal contradictions, wages a struggle with himself. In him, different desires collide, he is overcome by doubts, tormented by natural human fear. Sometimes he would like to give up everything, leave, take cover. And this is understandable. But he knows how to overcome internal discord and firmly goes to the goal. And this is the highest manifestation of moral duty. Moral duty, as it were, governs public duty, directs it, gives a person resilience, makes his actions conscious, and not impulsive.

Question 6. Who monitors and evaluates the performance of the debt?

There is a double control: external - control of society (public opinion) and internal - human self-control, i.e. conscience.

Question 7. What is conscience?

Love, duty, responsibility induce a person to action, deed. But inside a person, his every step is checked by his conscience. Conscience is a deep awareness of one's duty and responsibility, inner moral self-control and self-esteem of a person. And they also say about conscience: the inner eye. This is already a metaphor, a figurative expression.

Of course, conscience and consciousness of duty do not always manifest themselves at the level of reason, rational knowledge. Very often this is a deep personal feeling. A person may not be fully aware of why his conscience tells him to do this and not otherwise. Guided by his conscience, in the deepest recesses of his soul, he judges good and evil. When internal self-control tells a person that he acted honestly, correctly and took the side of good, the person's conscience is clear, calm. Well, if a person has not taken into account the voice of conscience - what then awaits him?

Question 8. In the play by the Russian playwright V. Rozov "A, B, C, D, D ..." there is an episode when one of the heroes says to a young man named Volodya: "Everyone has certain duties and must fulfill them." Volodya is indignant and declares in response: "I must, I must ... I owe nothing to anyone!"

Express your assessment of the clashing positions.

Everyone has responsibilities. If not direct, then indirect. The student must study, the worker must work, the housewife must maintain the house, etc. etc.

All people have specific social roles. Everyone must comply with them, so that their behavior in society is predictable. Thus, a person has duties that he himself does not even think about, which he performs always and everywhere. Therefore: everyone has certain responsibilities and must fulfill them.

Question 9. You already know that duty is duty multiplied by responsibility. Think what formalism is, a formal understanding of duty. Try to appreciate this phenomenon.

Formalism - Observance of the external form in something. to the detriment of the merits of the case.

Formalism is when, according to the letter of a law or an instruction, everything is correct, but in essence it is not correct and even criminal.

Formally refers to his duties - it means to act from "so far", not showing personal initiative and not taking into account any circumstances.

Question 10. Explain how you understand the meaning of the expressions "pangs of conscience", "remorse", "bad conscience", "calm conscience".

The concepts of "pangs of conscience", "remorse" and "bad conscience" are similar to each other and mean certain states of a person associated with his feelings about committed acts. These concepts go on increasing from "bad conscience" to "pangs of conscience", if in the first case a person realizes the mistake, but accepts it and does not particularly worry, then in the second case this mistake torments him, does not allow him to live in peace. But "calm conscience" is the opposite concept and can refer either to a person who has done everything right in his life, or to a shameless person.

Question 11. French philosopher of the XVI century. M. Montaigne wrote this about conscience: "Conscience can fill us with fear, just as it can fill us with confidence and peace of mind."

Expand the meaning of the words of the famous philosopher. In what cases, why does the conscience fill a person with fear? What could be the cause of the fear? And in what cases does conscience give a person confidence and peace of mind?

Conscience can fill a person with fear if he has acted vile because of his dislike and selfishness towards others. Let's say: you were asked for directions, and you prompted to follow that path. And because of hostility, you said the way where there are many dangers and therefore you think, "What if this person dies or injures himself ..." and so on.

Peace of mind arises when you helped a person or gave good advice (it doesn't matter) and he thanked you. You already know that you have done something good, and therefore your conscience is calm.

Question 12. We often say that people are held accountable before their consciences. But there are people about whom they say: "Shameless!" What kind of person is this? Can you even call him a person, a person? What are the consequences of his behavior for others and for himself?

The definition of "shameless" speaks for itself - this is a person who has no conscience. What kind of person is this? Impudent, unprincipled, living only for himself. Of course, you can call him a person in the biological sense of this word, and it is quite possible that he is a person, because not always shameless people demonstrate this peculiarity at every step. Such people are characterized by lies and hypocrisy, the ability to adapt to a situation to their advantage. For those around him, his behavior will have the consequences that are beneficial to the shameless person. Shameless people are not always condemned by our society, especially if they are rich. And for him, the lack of conscience is the calmness of the nervous system. The only people who will really suffer and suffer because of such a person are his relatives - parents, wife (husband), children, etc.

Question 13. The Indian philosopher and public figure M. Gandhi argued that in matters of conscience the law of the majority does not work. Explain why.

M. Gandhi was right in his assertion in matters of conscience. Each person has his own boundaries of his own conscience. Not every person is capable of committing acts of conscience. The law of conscience of the majority does not work, since everyone has a different conscience, and the opinion of the majority is not always correct and fair.

We often say that people are responsible before their conscience. But there are people about whom they say: "Shameless!" What kind of person is this? Can you just call him a person, a person? What are the consequences of his behavior for others and for himself?

Answers:

a shameless person is the kind of person who can easily cheat. he doesn't pay attention to being surrounded. you can call him a tomboy. he is a person because every person is a person. the consequences, of course, are not very good, he can harm both himself and others

Critical remarks.

First, if knowledge is power, then a moral person will also want to acquire knowledge in order to remake this unjust and cruel world so that everyone becomes happy. Therefore, the desire of a moral person for knowledge will be no less than that of a cruel and shameless egoist.
Secondly, a moral person is interested not in deceiving himself, but in having the correct idea of the people around him in order to change them. If he is confident in his strengths and abilities and is an optimist, then the fact that the people around him are not good will not upset him, since he will hope to re-educate them and turn them from bad people into good ones. The existence of evil and unhappy people allows him to even experience a sense of joy, destroying evil and making unhappy people happier.
Thirdly, every person, and not just a moral person, is limited by his desires and cannot control his own desires, as it is said in the article "Man is not the creator of his own destiny." A moral person just wants to do good deeds, to be grateful, and he does not want to do mean deeds, and a cruel and ruthless egoist does not want to do good deeds, but wants to do mean things, that is, they both float with the flow of their desires, and when they succeed satisfy their desires, experience a sense of joy. Thus, a moral person is not limited by a dogma that prohibits committing meanness, but is limited, like any person, by his desires. It's just that a moral person, in contrast to a cruel and ruthless egoist, is dominated by his desire to never commit meanness.
Fourthly, there is no connection between the number of beliefs and the intellectual development of a person. Since the solution of one equation with two unknowns does not have a unique solution, it is possible to take instead of the unknowns any two numbers that satisfy this equation. The outside world may exist and the outside world may not exist. The answer to the question whether the external world exists is "Yes" and "No" at the same time, since it is impossible to prove the existence of the external world, and it is impossible to prove that the external world does not exist. Therefore, it is not important for the intellectual development of a person whether he believes that the external world exists, or whether he believes that the external world does not exist. Belief in something that cannot be refuted cannot negatively affect the development of his mental abilities.

Vladimir Fomin. September 2011.

We would like all people to be honest, kind and friendly. But, unfortunately, there is no time for paradise on earth. Therefore, it's time to talk about shamelessness. It is not very pleasant, but necessary.

Meaning

When a person is deceived, he immediately remembers his conscience and begins to reflect on what state it is in today. These are useful thoughts, of course, but it is still better to be on the alert with those who are not credible.

Let's first turn to the explanatory dictionary, let it serve as our guide. First, let us define what is "conscience" - responsibility for their behavior before the people around, society. So, shamelessness is the opposite of conscience, right? Obviously. But in the explanatory dictionary, the definition of the object of research is much simpler: "shameless" - dishonest and arrogant. Yes, I must say that shamelessness has no independent meaning in the dictionary, the latter sends the sufferers to look at a related adjective, so do not be surprised.

There is only one problem here: the characteristics of an explanatory dictionary will not help us understand what conscience and its absence are. Therefore, let's look at how our moral ideas about the world are formed. Very briefly, naturally.

How conscience arises

When psychology as such did not exist, philosophy took over its functions. Philosophers defined conscience in a very poetic way. Someone said that conscience is the voice of God, someone said that the voice of Genesis (with a capital letter), perhaps, there were versions that this is the voice of reason. There were enough hypotheses. Now psychology has pulled off the mystical-poetic veil from moral attitudes, so we quite clearly imagine: conscience is our upbringing, coupled with self-development. Of course, the formation of conscience, like any views and beliefs, cannot be disassembled to the last screw. Therefore, not everything boils down to reading books and teaching parents. But the base is formed in childhood, because it was at that time that the concepts of good and evil were laid. True, there is always something elusive, constantly elusive in such schemes. Children often exhibit striking kindness or discouraging anger even before any teachings. Therefore, both points of view on (both philosophical and psychological) are still relevant.

Let the reader not be angry, consideration of the phenomenon of conscience is not a procrastination, but a necessary stop, which will make it possible to better understand the meaning of the word “shamelessness”.

What is shamelessness?

By the way, have you noticed what kind of reverence is recorded in the explanatory dictionary in relation to the word "conscience" and, on the contrary, disregard for its antonym? And all because it is difficult to maintain firm convictions, but to cheat, play around, deceive is easy. But is it? Whom do we call shameless? Those who do not match ours. Remember that the initial understanding of good and bad is formed in the family. One is brought up according to Christian ideals, while the other is just as carefully sculpted into a predator, a shark of capitalism, faithful to the ideas of social Darwinism. In other words, he not only thinks of himself as the strongest, but also considers himself the best. Although this does not follow even from Darwin's theory. Probably a lot of "isms", but in general everything is clear. And most importantly, in the eyes of a true Christian, the "predator" is the personification of shamelessness, this is obvious.

But in everyday speech, we usually mean what the explanatory dictionary says. Someone cheated someone or broke the law. The collision of two human worlds is quite difficult. And when a person violates social attitudes, everything plus or minus is clear. There is another name for shamelessness - disrespect. If one deceives the other, then he simply does not respect or appreciate him. Such is the disappointing conclusion.

Do you know what else you can think of at your leisure? On the bright side of the phenomenon that we are considering. If a person has no conscience, then this increases his flexibility, increases efficiency, and ultimately makes him more adaptable to the environment. By the way, this is what Darwinism is talking about, if you give it a social interpretation: it is not the best who survive, but the fittest. And in this sense, the importance of dishonesty should not be underestimated.